<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeff &amp; Vida – Selma Chalk (Rosebank Records)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/2009/09/18/jeff-vida-%e2%80%93%c2%a0selma-chalk-rosebank-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/2009/09/18/jeff-vida-%e2%80%93%c2%a0selma-chalk-rosebank-records/</link>
	<description>This website kills fascists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Taper</title>
		<link>http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/2009/09/18/jeff-vida-%e2%80%93%c2%a0selma-chalk-rosebank-records/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Taper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/?p=411#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s angry? Who&#039;s lonely? If there are any losers around here, then it must be good old fashioned horse-sense. So the reviewer doesn&#039;t like the record? That is their right to say that.

As it is, I thought the review was quite generous considering the fact that the reviewer was clearly having problems with the record in question. And this is nothing to do with ignorance. Music transcends knowledge and background - it&#039;s why it&#039;s so popular. This just comes down to personal opinions, and feelings which are to be considered and treated as such. If these opinions and feeligns disagree with your own opinions and feelings, then that is the nature of art, surely, and perhaps this even says something about our differences as human beings. 

Interesting that you bring nationality into it. You should be pleased that C&amp;W reaches across national borders. I mean America has to export &lt;i&gt;something&lt;/i&gt; during these hard times. Anyway, I think it&#039;s healthy that we have these differences - they are to be celebrated rather than used as a source of hurt. So someone, somewhere doesn&#039;t like a record. And someone, somewhere else, does like a record. Why get so mad about it? It&#039;s not like you &lt;i&gt;made&lt;/i&gt; the record. And even then, doesn&#039;t the Good Lord tell us to take the rough with the smooth? Well, no, He doesn&#039;t, but He should, because more people would listen to Him if he did. In summary: don&#039;t be so precious and turn the other cheek, Elisa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s angry? Who&#8217;s lonely? If there are any losers around here, then it must be good old fashioned horse-sense. So the reviewer doesn&#8217;t like the record? That is their right to say that.</p>
<p>As it is, I thought the review was quite generous considering the fact that the reviewer was clearly having problems with the record in question. And this is nothing to do with ignorance. Music transcends knowledge and background &#8211; it&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so popular. This just comes down to personal opinions, and feelings which are to be considered and treated as such. If these opinions and feeligns disagree with your own opinions and feelings, then that is the nature of art, surely, and perhaps this even says something about our differences as human beings. </p>
<p>Interesting that you bring nationality into it. You should be pleased that C&amp;W reaches across national borders. I mean America has to export <i>something</i> during these hard times. Anyway, I think it&#8217;s healthy that we have these differences &#8211; they are to be celebrated rather than used as a source of hurt. So someone, somewhere doesn&#8217;t like a record. And someone, somewhere else, does like a record. Why get so mad about it? It&#8217;s not like you <i>made</i> the record. And even then, doesn&#8217;t the Good Lord tell us to take the rough with the smooth? Well, no, He doesn&#8217;t, but He should, because more people would listen to Him if he did. In summary: don&#8217;t be so precious and turn the other cheek, Elisa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisa Bufon</title>
		<link>http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/2009/09/18/jeff-vida-%e2%80%93%c2%a0selma-chalk-rosebank-records/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisa Bufon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.folkingcool.co.uk/?p=411#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Oh, you poor, poor, lonely, angry man. Would that you&#039;d kept your ignorance under a bushel basket rather than expose it to light of day. I wish to fall dead if you are musician of any talent. Were you, you would be able to appreicate the talents of all six musicians on this recording, but most-especially burke. But I must remember, you may be British, which would explain a lot. Keep sending over the New Castle and keep your ignorant, snarky drivel to yourself loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you poor, poor, lonely, angry man. Would that you&#8217;d kept your ignorance under a bushel basket rather than expose it to light of day. I wish to fall dead if you are musician of any talent. Were you, you would be able to appreicate the talents of all six musicians on this recording, but most-especially burke. But I must remember, you may be British, which would explain a lot. Keep sending over the New Castle and keep your ignorant, snarky drivel to yourself loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
